首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination in adult and adolescent patients with persistent asthma: A randomized trial
【2h】

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol compared with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination in adult and adolescent patients with persistent asthma: A randomized trial

机译:糠酸氟替卡松/维兰特罗与丙酸氟替卡松/沙美特罗联合治疗成人和青少年持续性哮喘患者的疗效和安全性:随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The combination of fluticasone furoate (FF), a novel inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and vilanterol (VI), a long-acting β2 agonist, is under development as a once-daily treatment of asthma and COPD. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of FF/VI with fluticasone propionate (FP)/salmeterol (SAL) in patients with persistent asthma uncontrolled on a medium dose of ICS. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, 806 patients received FF/VI (100/25 μg, n = 403) once daily in the evening delivered through ELLIPTA (GlaxoSmithKline) dry powder inhaler, or FP/SAL (250/50 μg, n = 403) bid through DISKUS/ACCUHALER (GlaxoSmithKline). The primary efficacy measure was 0- to 24-h serial weighted mean (wm) FEV 1 after 24 weeks of treatment. Results: Improvements from baseline in 0- to 24-h wmFEV 1 were observed with both FF/VI (341 mL) and FP/SAL (377 mL); the adjusted mean treatment difference was not statistically significant (-37 mL; 95% CI, -88 to 15, P = 0.162). There were no differences between 0- to 4-h serial wmFEV1, trough FEV1, and asthma control and quality-of-life questionnaire scores. There was no difference in reported exacerbations between treatments. Both treatments were well tolerated, with no clinically relevant effect on urinary cortisol excretion or vital signs and no treatment-related serious adverse events. Conclusions: The efficacy of once-daily FF/VI was similar to bid FP/SAL in improving lung function in patients with persistent asthma. No safety issues were identified. © 2013 American College of Chest Physicians.
机译:背景:氟替卡松(FF)(一种新型的吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS))和维兰特罗(VI)(一种长效β2激动剂)的组合正在开发中,作为每日一次的哮喘和COPD治疗药物。这项研究的目的是比较FF / VI与丙酸氟替卡松(FP)/沙美特罗(SAL)在中剂量ICS不能控制的持续性哮喘患者中的疗效。方法:在一项随机,双盲,双模拟,平行组研究中,每天晚上有806名患者通过ELLIPTA(葛兰素史克)干粉吸入器接受FF / VI(100/25μg,n = 403)每天一次,或FP / SAL(250/50μg,n = 403)通过DISKUS / ACCUHALER(GlaxoSmithKline)出价。主要疗效指标是治疗24周后0到24小时连续加权平均值(wm)FEV 1。结果:FF / VI(341 mL)和FP / SAL(377 mL)均观察到wmFEV 1从0到24小时基线的改善。调整后的平均治疗差异无统计学意义(-37 mL; 95%CI,-88至15,P = 0.162)。在0至4小时的连续wmFEV1,谷底FEV1与哮喘控制和生活质量问卷评分之间没有差异。治疗之间报道的急性发作没有差异。两种治疗均耐受良好,对尿皮质醇排泄或生命体征无临床相关影响,也无与治疗相关的严重不良事件。结论:每天一次的FF / VI在改善持续性哮喘患者的肺功能方面的功效与bid / FP / SAL相似。没有发现安全问题。 ©2013美国胸科医师学院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号